BLOG

Resources for Educators
& Professionals

 

Global Health 101: The Cost of Health System Performance

by  Richard Skolnik     Oct 4, 2019
default-crowd

In the last several years, I realized much better than before how important it is at beginning of a course to set out the metric against which health system performance will be judged. This can be a powerful organizing principle as one goes through the course, especially given the quest for universal health coverage.

With the help of many friends and especially Prof. Ole Norheim from the University of Bergen, I would suggest that the goals of a health system are to: Maximize the health of a population, in fairly distributed ways, at least cost.

What does this mean, at least to me?

  • First, it means that governments should aim at enabling their people to live as long and as healthy as possible.
  • Second, it means that governments have an obligation to do this in ethical ways, by ensuring that all of their people have an equal chance to live as long and as healthy as possible.
  • Third, every government should aspire to achieve these aims at the least possible cost .. and hopefully, as fast as possible, which I will discuss further below.

Global Health 101, Fourth Edition sets out this point first in the key messages in Chapter 1. It pursues the goals of a health system at greater length in the section on ethical priority setting in Chapter 5, which includes a case study on ethical priority setting in health in Norway. Chapter 6, on health systems, explores the concept of universal health coverage at some length and elaborates on the goals of a health system.

Related to the above, I also want to help my students right from the start of a course to understand the notion of “value for money” in health. Is the goal of a health system to maximize health in fairly distributed ways at any cost?  Or, are governments obligated to try to ensure they achieve this goal at least cost?

MRKT_9781284160956_WEBx_SKOLblog_4

To help my students understand this, I start with some simple questions that help them understand they (hopefully!!) would not pay $300 for something that they could get for $200. Then I give them some examples from health, such as two treatments that achieve the same clinical outcome … but one costs three times the price of the other and ask them if they were using their own money, which they would buy.

I then remind them that there will “never be enough money” – not even in Norway – to do all that one wants to do in health or in any other sector. Thus, I want to encourage them from the start of their studies of global health to always ask themselves:  If the government has only $100 to spend, how should it spend it to enable the best health for its people, in fairly distributed ways?

I also suggest to them that we will consider this question continuously throughout the course and discuss tools, like cost-effectiveness analysis, that can be used to make criteria-based and principle-based decisions about health expenditure.

Finally, I remind them to keep in mind the notion that: In many respects, it is more important how you spend money than how much you spend.  If you only had two choices, for example for public expenditure on health: coronary bypass surgery for one person or vaccinating, say 5,000 children against measles, which should you finance?

If you went through the budget of any health system, how aligned would the expenditure of that system be with the aims of maximizing health, in fairly distributed ways, at least cost? WHO has written that an important share of money spent on health is “wasted” and does not align with this goal.

If you really want to provoke your students (and yourselves!) about ethical priority setting, I encourage you to have the students watch a Ted Talk by Toby Ord, a Professor of Philosophy at Oxford and a scholar of “the ethics of giving.” 

Chapter 1 of Global Health 101, Fourth Edition introduces the concept of value for money in health. Chapter 4 on Health, Education, Poverty and the Economy, and Chapter 6 on Health Systems explores this and related notions further. The concept of value for money is also pursued throughout all of the core chapters.

 

About the Author

Richard Skolnik, MPA - Yale, School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
Richard Skolnik has spent more than 40 years working on international development and global health and was formerly a lecturer in the Yale School of Public Health, the Yale School of Management, and the George Washington University School of Public Health.

For more information about Global Health 101, Fourth Edition visit www.globalhealth101.com

Stay Connected

Categories

Clear

Search Blogs

Featured Posts

Global Health 101: The Cost of Health System Performance

by  Richard Skolnik     Oct 4, 2019
default-crowd

In the last several years, I realized much better than before how important it is at beginning of a course to set out the metric against which health system performance will be judged. This can be a powerful organizing principle as one goes through the course, especially given the quest for universal health coverage.

With the help of many friends and especially Prof. Ole Norheim from the University of Bergen, I would suggest that the goals of a health system are to: Maximize the health of a population, in fairly distributed ways, at least cost.

What does this mean, at least to me?

  • First, it means that governments should aim at enabling their people to live as long and as healthy as possible.
  • Second, it means that governments have an obligation to do this in ethical ways, by ensuring that all of their people have an equal chance to live as long and as healthy as possible.
  • Third, every government should aspire to achieve these aims at the least possible cost .. and hopefully, as fast as possible, which I will discuss further below.

Global Health 101, Fourth Edition sets out this point first in the key messages in Chapter 1. It pursues the goals of a health system at greater length in the section on ethical priority setting in Chapter 5, which includes a case study on ethical priority setting in health in Norway. Chapter 6, on health systems, explores the concept of universal health coverage at some length and elaborates on the goals of a health system.

Related to the above, I also want to help my students right from the start of a course to understand the notion of “value for money” in health. Is the goal of a health system to maximize health in fairly distributed ways at any cost?  Or, are governments obligated to try to ensure they achieve this goal at least cost?

MRKT_9781284160956_WEBx_SKOLblog_4

To help my students understand this, I start with some simple questions that help them understand they (hopefully!!) would not pay $300 for something that they could get for $200. Then I give them some examples from health, such as two treatments that achieve the same clinical outcome … but one costs three times the price of the other and ask them if they were using their own money, which they would buy.

I then remind them that there will “never be enough money” – not even in Norway – to do all that one wants to do in health or in any other sector. Thus, I want to encourage them from the start of their studies of global health to always ask themselves:  If the government has only $100 to spend, how should it spend it to enable the best health for its people, in fairly distributed ways?

I also suggest to them that we will consider this question continuously throughout the course and discuss tools, like cost-effectiveness analysis, that can be used to make criteria-based and principle-based decisions about health expenditure.

Finally, I remind them to keep in mind the notion that: In many respects, it is more important how you spend money than how much you spend.  If you only had two choices, for example for public expenditure on health: coronary bypass surgery for one person or vaccinating, say 5,000 children against measles, which should you finance?

If you went through the budget of any health system, how aligned would the expenditure of that system be with the aims of maximizing health, in fairly distributed ways, at least cost? WHO has written that an important share of money spent on health is “wasted” and does not align with this goal.

If you really want to provoke your students (and yourselves!) about ethical priority setting, I encourage you to have the students watch a Ted Talk by Toby Ord, a Professor of Philosophy at Oxford and a scholar of “the ethics of giving.” 

Chapter 1 of Global Health 101, Fourth Edition introduces the concept of value for money in health. Chapter 4 on Health, Education, Poverty and the Economy, and Chapter 6 on Health Systems explores this and related notions further. The concept of value for money is also pursued throughout all of the core chapters.

 

About the Author

Richard Skolnik, MPA - Yale, School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
Richard Skolnik has spent more than 40 years working on international development and global health and was formerly a lecturer in the Yale School of Public Health, the Yale School of Management, and the George Washington University School of Public Health.

For more information about Global Health 101, Fourth Edition visit www.globalhealth101.com

Tags

Clear